Designer/writer/other
Available for freelance and commissions. If you have a question or would like to discuss a project, please get in touch.

hello@danielgray.com
@gray
Thursday
Mar032011

Port

I'm quite excited by Port magazine, if only for the article How to Manage the Effects of a Military Attack By Daniel Day-Lewis … which I now realise I may have misunderstood …

It's a decent looking men's mag, joining the likes of Man About Town and Esquire (the UK Edition at least) as titles that bother to treat men as grown ups. I have high hopes. Now for the big problem: where to get it. If you want to go out and buy a magazine in York, you pretty much have one option: WH Smiths. And they hate magazines. From what I can gather by the way the stock is flung at the wall with little respect for publisher or customer, they only stock magazines as a means of insulation.

Smaller titles are starting to avoid Smiths altogether. Angharad Lewis recently explained to Andrew at Magtastic Blogsplosion why the back-from-the-dead Grafik won't be appearing on the high street:

The aim is to cut down on wastage and sell to people more directly. We used to spend a lot of money and waste a lot of copies being stocked in WH Smith. They take a massive percentage of the cover price and pulp about half of all copies they stock. So we’re aiming to replace WH Smith and newsagent sales with direct online sales. You can buy a single issue online and have it delivered the next day.

I used to be part of this ridiculous machine myself. When I worked at Game (oh so many years ago), whenever new issues of Dreamcast Apologist Quarterly, Playstation Shut-In and Patrick Moore's Terrifying Floating Head Gazzette arrived, we'd have to tear off the covers of the old ones, post them back to the distributors, and then chuck the rest of the magazine in the bin. Absolutely ludicrous.

I understand why publishers would want to make the most of direct online sales, but it's a shame that I can't browse through physical copies magazines in a friendly environment anywhere. I don't want to have to buy a magazine just to see if it's any good. I need to flick through it first. Feel the weight. Smell the ink.

I think there's a real gap in the market for a shop that sells a considered, curated selection of magazines and, while you're at it (because we're probably about to lose HMV), books, music, comics and movies. A kind of miniature Borders/Fopp/Magma hybrid. Curation is the key. Shops – you will never be able to stock the quantities or range that websites can, so don't pretend that you can. What you can offer is tangibility and quality of selection. Make the most of the haptic. Do that and you keep the high street just that little extra bit more alive.

And that is how you manage the effects of a military attack by Daniel Day-Lewis.

« We are science fiction | Main | Blade Runner Kick Stopper »

Reader Comments (3)

I've never understood why left over previous issues of magazines can't be shuffled off to a discount area. If you're sitting on the fence on whether to follow a magazine of not, a cheaper old issue might be the trick in winning you over. But I guess that would cut in to those expensive back issue orders.

March 3, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterNathan

It's the sale or return system the industry uses; stores only pay for issues they sell. Say, 5 copies go into 1,000 shops. An average 3 copies are sold, so each store has to prove they haven't sold those additional 2 copies. Simple way– return the torn off cover as proof.

This combined with the limited time for sale – per week or month – mean a huge volume is wasted as magazines over-print so they can have copies in as many stores as possible.

March 3, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJeremy

Ah yes Dan I remember the time spent ripping the covers off perfectly good magazines. It struck me as ludicrous too.

I have to say though that these days I just don't read magazines any more. I used to subscribe to Edge but found that I just wasn't reading enough of it to justify the subscription. Thinking that maybe I was just growing bored of video games journalism I switched to New Scientist but the same thing happened, despite the articles being very interesting when I bothered to read them. The fact is that I no longer read anything shorter than a book offline...

March 4, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRob McD

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>